![[ Back to EurekAlert! ]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_seMMLKp0biFnvv83TqZRglz0ckpRBsO2LMxDo_cpV-NrfJajZVxvzey5l8xNAeRqCehO5c5nazEIlHcruXg_xX1ePbq0Lq8ibfMMD3YBk=s0-d){kind=small}
Public release date: 22-Jul-2013[ | E-mail |
Share ] Contact: Susan Emigh
emighs@mcmaster.ca
90-552-591-402-2555
McMaster University
Hamilton, ON (July 22, 2013) Financial incentives for Ontario surgeons are likely a key factor driving greater use of laparoscopic colon cancer surgery, says a study led by a McMaster University surgeon.
The research, published online by the Annals of Surgical Oncology, found that between 2002 and 2009 there was an increase in laparoscopic versus traditional open techniques for colon and rectal cancer surgery. These increases were associated with only minimal decreases in how long patients stayed in hospital after surgery and no changes in the survival of patients.
The authors point out that in October 2005, the Ontario physician billing schedule was altered, providing surgeons with a 25% premium if laparoscopic rather than open techniques were used for colon cancer. In Ontario, surgeon and hospital services are publically funded and patients don't pay. Most of the incentives went to surgeons already enthusiastic about laparoscopic approaches.
"Our paper highlights two important issues," said principal investigator Dr. Marko Simunovic, an associate professor of surgery of McMaster's Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine.
"First, in our publicly funded health care system we need to critically review the advantages and disadvantages of new expensive technologies or treatments before they're widely introduced into the province. Second, Ontario physicians provide high quality care to the best of their abilities - one should question the logic of financial incentives."
Simunovic added: "A 25% bonus for laparoscopic surgery sends a strong signal to surgeons that they should provide this service, even though the available evidence to date does not demonstrate superiority for laparoscopic versus open techniques."
The more expensive laparoscopic surgery usually results in a smaller visible scar and a slightly shorter hospital length of stay.
###
The research was funded by Canadian Institutes for Health Research.
Editors: A copy of the paper may be found here: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1245%2Fs10434-013-3123-2
For further information:
Susan Emigh
Media Relations
Faculty of Health Sciences
McMaster University
905-525-9140, ext. 22555
emighs@mcmaster.ca
[ | E-mail | Share ] ?
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.
Public release date: 22-Jul-2013[ | E-mail |
Share ] Contact: Susan Emigh
emighs@mcmaster.ca
90-552-591-402-2555
McMaster University
Hamilton, ON (July 22, 2013) Financial incentives for Ontario surgeons are likely a key factor driving greater use of laparoscopic colon cancer surgery, says a study led by a McMaster University surgeon.
The research, published online by the Annals of Surgical Oncology, found that between 2002 and 2009 there was an increase in laparoscopic versus traditional open techniques for colon and rectal cancer surgery. These increases were associated with only minimal decreases in how long patients stayed in hospital after surgery and no changes in the survival of patients.
The authors point out that in October 2005, the Ontario physician billing schedule was altered, providing surgeons with a 25% premium if laparoscopic rather than open techniques were used for colon cancer. In Ontario, surgeon and hospital services are publically funded and patients don't pay. Most of the incentives went to surgeons already enthusiastic about laparoscopic approaches.
"Our paper highlights two important issues," said principal investigator Dr. Marko Simunovic, an associate professor of surgery of McMaster's Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine.
"First, in our publicly funded health care system we need to critically review the advantages and disadvantages of new expensive technologies or treatments before they're widely introduced into the province. Second, Ontario physicians provide high quality care to the best of their abilities - one should question the logic of financial incentives."
Simunovic added: "A 25% bonus for laparoscopic surgery sends a strong signal to surgeons that they should provide this service, even though the available evidence to date does not demonstrate superiority for laparoscopic versus open techniques."
The more expensive laparoscopic surgery usually results in a smaller visible scar and a slightly shorter hospital length of stay.
###
The research was funded by Canadian Institutes for Health Research.
Editors: A copy of the paper may be found here: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1245%2Fs10434-013-3123-2
For further information:
Susan Emigh
Media Relations
Faculty of Health Sciences
McMaster University
905-525-9140, ext. 22555
emighs@mcmaster.ca
[ | E-mail | Share ] ?
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.
Source: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-07/mu-pbh072213.php
hopkins hopkins dear john derrick rose torn acl undrafted free agents braveheart roy orbison
